Those of you who, like myself, are loyal FireFox users have by now probably fallen in love with the Awesome Bar. Despite it’s childish name the Awesome Bar really does transform the way a browser, it’s history and it’s favourite site list work for the user by making all of these things available to you in the URL bar when you start typing.
As you type in the Awesome Bar, the browser searches your history and favourites to find things you’ve used or bookmarked in the past that match. This allows you to, rather than either searching your favourites or typing whole URLs in the address bar, simply type in “wordpress function” and get the Wordpress Function Reference page as the first choice, assuming you’ve been to that page, bookmarked it, and haven’t been to a bunch of other pages with similar names. Further, the Awesome Bar seems to also take into account your history of selecting it’s search results into account. I have a couple of different ways of accessing my webmail, for example, but FireFox has learned which method is my preferred method.
So, yeah. I’m a big fan of this new way of doing things. And Google’s Chrome seems to add the same functionality. But there’s a down side of which I informed Mozilla through their feedback system, for what it’s worth: the Awesome Bar has the potential to be a Christmas Spoiler Bar if they don’t make some serious improvements in the next month or so.
Imagine buying your wife a nice piece of jewelry from your favourite online store only to have her sit down to the computer later that same day and - in searching for something totally unrelated - come across an Awesome Bar result that says “thank you for your order, other people who bought ‘priceless jewelry’ also bought. . .” Not awesome. Not awesome in the slightest. In fact, it would suck.
What do you do in this case? It’s important enough that you might be tempted to dump your browser history. But wait! Isn’t that defeating the purpose of the Awesome Bar, at least a little? Of course it is. And particularly for those of us who do a fair amount of research online, the Awesome Bar is like a running dynamic notes list we can refer back to, and losing that functionality for a few months over Christmas holiday is really throwing the baby out with the bath water. But what else is there?
A better solution would be if FireFox provided a couple options:
I think that the inclusion of these simple features would vastly improve the Awesome Bar for all of us who are slowly becoming addicted to it’s usefulness. I say “simple,” because I have no idea what it would take to make these things happen, of course.
October 26, 2007, 7:07 am Prism: Bringing the Desktop Out of the Office
This is really a cool development in web applications.
Mozilla Labs Blog » Blog Archive » Prism
Unlike Adobe AIR and Microsoft Silverlight, we’re not building a proprietary platform to replace the web. We think the web is a powerful and open platform for this sort of innovation, so our goal is to identify and facilitate the development of enhancements that bring the advantages of desktop apps to the web platform.
Technorati Tags: Technology, Web, Mozilla
February 9, 2007, 3:45 pm Handy Little Doo-Dad for FireFox
God, I just love, love, LOVE Firefox. Is there a web developer alive out there that disagrees?
While updating my Firebug extension, I noticed that one of the bug fixes for 1.0.1 was a compatibility issue with another extension, the HTML Validator.
“Pray tell,” I asked, “what could this machine be?” Well, as it turns out, its yet another breathtakingly useful tool in the arsenal of a web developer, this one validates a page based on the W3C standards without posting it to the W3C site for the results:
Html Validator for Firefox and Mozilla
HTML Validator is a Mozilla extension that adds HTML validation inside Firefox and Mozilla. The number of errors of a HTML page is seen on the form of an icon in the status bar when browsing. The details of the errors are seen when looking the HTML source of the page.
Of course, this simple explanation sells the plugin somewhat short. The big thing is this: ordinarily, you would need to go to the W3C validator and put in the URL, then it spits back a bunch of errors and warnings with line numbers. All well and good, but now you have to go through your code to find out where that line occurs. . . and oh, by the way, if you’re writing PHP-generated HTML, then there isn’t a standing document where you can find that line.
Aggravating? Oh, you betcha! But with the Validator extension, just as with FireBug, you get to see the currently-laid out HTML as it happens and find exactly what is causing the error, thus saving yourself considerable time digging through your PHP include files to figure out which one’s causing the freakin’ error message!!!
Technorati Tags: FireFox, Firebug, HTML Validator, Tools, Development
powered by performancing firefox
Bad Behavior has blocked 49 access attempts in the last 7 days.